?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry




My question for today: Are you for or against same sex marriages? Why? (Optional) Remember, you can express your own feelings whether you agree with me or not. Why? Because this LJ has always BELIEVED in freedom of speech.

I am for same sex marriages. Why? Because it’s none of my business.

What a better world this would be if we would all mind our own business when it comes to other people’s lifestyle.

Gay men and lesbians should have every right to marry, and I find it hypocritical that some of those opposing it have quite a few skeletons in their closets when it comes to their own marriages. It isn’t like the majority of straight marriages have been a good example. If I were to add links to public figures of marriages between men and women’s infidelities here, my list would be from here to kingdom come. Sure, there are marriages where husbands and wives remain faithful, but those are just a few.

We are facing so many devastating problems in not only our country, but our world; grave problems such as the oil spill, unemployment, war, drugs, racism, hunger, homelessness, (just to name a few among many), so why not concentrate on them instead of sticking our nose in other Americans personal business. Why not just live and let live?

Sure, the Bible calls Homosexuality an abomination, but it also calls these things an abomination. Who among us can say we have not committed a few abominations from this list?

Cheating (Mic. 6:10)
A froward man (perverse; one who turns aside (Pro. 3:32; 11:20)
A proud look (Pro. 6:16-17)
A lying tongue (Pro. 6:17; 12:22)
A wicked scheming heart (Pro. 6:18)
A false witness that speaks lies (Pro. 6:19)
A sower of discord (Pro. 6:19)
Wickedness (Pro. 8:7)
A false balance or scale (Pro. 11:1)
Sacrifices of the wicked (Pro. 15:8; 21:27)
The way of the wicked (Pro. 15:9)
The thoughts of the wicked (Pro. 15:26)
The proud of heart (Pro. 16:5)
Justifying the wicked (Pro. 17:15)
Condemning the just (Pro. 17:15)
Divers, dishonest weights (Pro. 20:10, 23)
Divers, dishonest measures (Pro. 20:10)
Refusing to hear the law (Pro. 28:9)
Homosexuality (Lev. 18:22; 20:13; Dt. 23:18)
Re-marriage of former companions (Dt. 24:1-4)
Cheating others (Dt. 25:13-16)
Incense offered by hypocrites (Isa. 1:13)
Eating unclean things (Isa. 66:17)
Robbery (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Murder (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Adultery (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Oppression of others, particularly the poor or vulnerable (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Violence (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Breaking vows (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Lying with a menstruous woman (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Hardness of heart (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Injustice (Ezek. 18: 6-13)
Incest (Lev. 19: 6-30)
Things highly esteemed by man (Lk. 16:15)


Moveon.ORG



Join The NRA
"The Right Of The People To Keep and
Bear Arms, Shall Not 500infringed."

Comments

( 46 comments — Leave a comment )
ayoub
Aug. 5th, 2010 07:09 pm (UTC)
I am for same sex marriages. Why? Because it’s none of my business.

My thoughts exactly!
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 01:51 am (UTC)
Amen!
stevie_stever
Aug. 5th, 2010 07:17 pm (UTC)
I see no reason to deny a right I myself enjoy. I see no threat. I also take issue with the discrimination at state and/or federal level with respect to paying higher taxes and the extra hoops a homosexual couple has to jump through just to make sure his or her spouse is included in a will, or to decide who makes decisions with respect to health care in the event a spouse is unable to make decisions, or even to adopt a child. It is discriminatory to continue with a tradition of unfairness which serves no one. I'd go so far as to call any such continuance of tradition 'hateful'.
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 01:52 am (UTC)
Agreed!
(Deleted comment)
nishar
Aug. 5th, 2010 08:13 pm (UTC)
The only man, and his army, to ever conqueor the known world was bi-sexual. For most of his life Alexander the Great was fire island gay. We could use a lot more men/women in the military like him.
(no subject) - playgirl - Aug. 6th, 2010 02:29 am (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
nishar
Aug. 5th, 2010 08:08 pm (UTC)
To me gay marriage is a civil rights issue. Pure and simple, gays should be allowed to screw up their lives, just like us straights, and get married. Now considering I am a Republican, that may seem odd. Once apawn a time, Republicans were all about getting government out of our lives. Now they want a Big Nanny state via a theocracy. You know, the kind of thing our founding fathers wanted no part of.
Jesus freed us from having to follow the old Mosiac law. http://bible.org/article/mosaic-law-its-function-and-purpose-new-testament Oddly enough Anton Levay wrote an article about that years ago. Though he was making fun of Christians who had no real clue what Jesus taught and believed in other things: like the Mosiac laws.

We still have to live according to God's path for us. The old laws are not for us.
darkknightradic
Aug. 5th, 2010 08:47 pm (UTC)
Oddly enough, in Romans God still calls homosexuality an abomination. It's not a matter of Mosaic law but how God set up the home (man and woman). No one is born gay. It's a choice.
(no subject) - smjayman - Aug. 5th, 2010 09:01 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tigron_x - Aug. 5th, 2010 10:34 pm (UTC) - Expand
No one is born gay. It's a choice. - playgirl - Aug. 6th, 2010 01:48 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: No one is born gay. It's a choice. - dragynphly - Aug. 6th, 2010 03:40 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - nishar - Aug. 6th, 2010 03:18 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - playgirl - Aug. 6th, 2010 01:56 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - nishar - Aug. 6th, 2010 03:19 am (UTC) - Expand
tigron_x
Aug. 5th, 2010 10:36 pm (UTC)
What does marriage have to do with the government anyways?
edbook
Aug. 5th, 2010 11:11 pm (UTC)
I agree, it's neither my or my government's business.

Peace
(no subject) - playgirl - Aug. 6th, 2010 01:51 am (UTC) - Expand
daddy
Aug. 5th, 2010 10:53 pm (UTC)
Lets look at a few things first.
MARRIAGE: noun; A social institution under which a man and a woman establish their decision to live as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies or local statues. At least thats what my Funk and Wagonals says.

California already has a Civil Union where people of the same sex can join into and t5hey in turn receive the same benefits as two people who are married its just not called "marriage".

So basically they are asking for the definition of marriage to be changed for no real reason. If they change it now when will they be asking for marriage to be between 3, 4, 5 or more people?

As for the joining between two people whether they are boys, girls or one of each, as long as they love each other and wanna share their lives together, I am all for it. I have friends who are gays and lesbians, and I only want them to be happy. You don't need to change the definition for that to be.
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 01:36 am (UTC)
What hypocracy!
I don't believe love is the only thing that matters to the gay community. When men and a women fall in love, don't some choose to eventually marry? Why can't the gay community have the same choice? Aren't they American citizens, just as the hetrosexuals are? Why such a double standard? Seems to me they are viewed as 2nd class citizens without their freedom of choice. They pay taxes and fight for this country. After all, this is the good old U.S.A., right?

I gave a list of things called abominations in the Bible. If someone can say he/she has never committed at least one of those abominations, that that person must have a halo as a crown, and angel wings attached to his/her back.

I'll take Newt Gingrich for example. He said that the gay marriage ruling was outrageous. Hasn't this judgemental man been married three times, and had an extramarital affair? Isn't this one of the ABOMINATIONS mentioned in the Bible?

There are many men and women like this man who judge others while having a great big invisible scarlet letter branded on their forehead, not to mention a stinking dirty diaper themselves. What hypocracy!





Edited at 2010-08-06 01:38 am (UTC)
Re: What hypocracy! - daddy - Aug. 6th, 2010 02:44 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: What hypocracy! - playgirl - Aug. 6th, 2010 06:54 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tigron_x - Aug. 6th, 2010 04:03 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - daddy - Aug. 6th, 2010 01:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tigron_x - Aug. 6th, 2010 11:10 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - daddy - Aug. 7th, 2010 01:19 am (UTC) - Expand
foskat
Aug. 5th, 2010 11:34 pm (UTC)
marriage
hey if someone can find someone to love, let them have it.
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 01:50 am (UTC)
Re: marriage
Love is always better than the hatred those who are always sticking their nose in other people's business.
dragynphly
Aug. 6th, 2010 03:56 am (UTC)
I am FOR same sex MARRIAGE. It is past time we as a civilization do shake up, and redefine. Why should the fact that marriage was defined centuries ago as being between a man and woman stop us from letting everyone be equal now? The earth was flat centuries ago. Now not only do we know it's not, we have been off the earth to visit the moon. Centuries ago a strong woman like Savannah would have been shunned and punished for her outspoken nature. If things were meant to stay the same, we would not even have the freedom of speech to be discussing this.

Let them have marriage. Let all things be equal. Not different but equal, but exactly the same.
drake57
Aug. 6th, 2010 04:16 am (UTC)
I don't see any Gay people trying to make laws to ban "straight marraiges" or anyone's religion.
Religion proves over and over that it has nothing to with God and continues to dominate,hurt and control weak minds.
Freedom of Speech and Freedom from Religion
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 06:52 pm (UTC)
"Freedom of Speech and Freedom from Religion"
That's what the Constitution says!
fourcorners
Aug. 6th, 2010 08:26 am (UTC)
I don't think people who sow discord should be allowed to marry
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 06:51 pm (UTC)
That sure would eliminate many of this world's woes! :o)
bluesman02779
Aug. 6th, 2010 11:52 am (UTC)
How do "they" measure how much discord one sows? I think heterosexuality is a birth defect.
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 06:49 pm (UTC)
I guess "they" measure it by their own levels of discord. :o)
lemmy59
Aug. 6th, 2010 01:34 pm (UTC)
I'm against it, and yes, because of my beliefs in the Church and my own morals. However, and this may seem weird, I'd be for civil unions. Let 'em be as miserable as the rest of us ;)
playgirl
Aug. 6th, 2010 06:48 pm (UTC)
I respect your feelings about this issue.

"Let 'em be as miserable as the rest of us"
Thanks for the giggles! :o)
manoman
Aug. 6th, 2010 09:59 pm (UTC)
I'm in favor of same sex marriages. Why not? Two people in love and wanting to make a commitment of marriage. I find gays and lesbians to be people with the same desires in life that I have. I've met many and don't really feel they are different.

I think the main two reasons people are against this are religious belief (although sometimes that doesn't seem like the real reason) and then there are those who just cannot deal with the idea of homosexuality. Wonder why?
playgirl
Aug. 12th, 2010 08:41 pm (UTC)
I wonder why, too!
mistressmarilyn
Aug. 7th, 2010 07:40 am (UTC)
The whole 'family unit' concept that worked so well for the world's major religions (and some of the minor ones) to help define human civilization in the first place has become woefully inadequate. Yes, it worked for a long time. There was a time when a woman needed a man for protection and for financial support; if she was pregnant or nursing and caring for the children, she couldn't fight off wild animals and marauders and the like.

But, good lord, this hasn't been true for a century at least. And once firearms were invented (the Great Equalizer), women could protect themselves, anyway. (Plus, they could rob banks, if necessary.)

So. Now that men aren't absolutely necessary in the family unit, they can feel free to pair off with their own kind. And women can choose who they want--man, woman, whatever.

Seriously, it's time to re-define marriage and family. This is a new era. We need a new unit at the core of our civilization. Let's pray for an answer, and I volunteer to ask Jesus. Because, yes, you can love Him and still think it's okay to be gay, bi, trans-gender or bleached blonde . . .
playgirl
Aug. 12th, 2010 08:40 pm (UTC)
I couldn't have said it any better! Thank you!
gypsyblackthorn
Aug. 11th, 2010 04:56 am (UTC)
I'm a huge supporter of same-sex marriage. I definitely fall in line behind you as far as it being no one else's business, but I'm also a human rights activist and depriving someone of the legal right to marry is a gross violation of human rights. I wanted to leave this comment to let you know that I added you to my friends. I look forward to reading your entries and getting to know you. My writing is a bit racy and cynical, but I still think it's fun. If you wander over to my journal, please do enjoy yourself.
playgirl
Aug. 12th, 2010 05:19 am (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for adding me!


( 46 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2015
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com