Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

E-ZPass Used To Prove Adultery

Tigua Tribe Indians
Speaking Rock Casino & Entertainment Centre
E-ZPass Used To Prove Adultery

If you’re cheating on you wife or husband, you better stop, ‘cuz your adulterous affair could possibly be exposed by E-ZPass. And for those who have never cheated on their spouse, you’re still being WATCHED! Those who would stoop so low as to use this despicable invasion of privacy mechanism, have they no dignity or shame?

These are the States where E-ZPass will be released in divorce cases:

Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia.

BALL and CHAIN continue popping in my mind when I think about the institution of marriage, AND our government?! Big Brother Surveillance is constantly thinking of ways to further violate our privacy.

What do you think about this?

E-ZPass Used To Prove Adultery

Spice Girls

Join The NRA

"The Right Of The People To Keep and
Bear Arms, Shall Not Be infringed."


( 48 comments — Leave a comment )
Aug. 13th, 2007 09:33 pm (UTC)
I think that you shouldn't go to New Jersey and if you're supposed to be in Phillie - I'm just sayin'

"They played a role in the murder case against Melanie McGuire, a New Jersey nurse convicted in April of killing her husband and tossing his cut-up remains into the Chesapeake Bay in three matching suitcases in 2004. Prosecutors used toll records to reconstruct her movements."

I think that ultimately for criminal cases, it is a good thing. And if you can afford it, why not in divorce cases? You lie to get away with wrong doing and people will find a way to play that game and now they can get caught. I don't see that one side is any more despicable that the other.
Aug. 13th, 2007 11:48 pm (UTC)
body parts have been found Chesapeake Bay
I just can't understand why a person would stay with their spouse if there's suspicion of adultery. Why not just file for divorce, instead of prolonging the agony? Just do it! Why make a complete stranger (lawyer) wealthier because of personal family suffering? Just have an amicable divorce by splitting all possessions half and half, and each go on their merry way!

I'm an avid watcher of anything that has to do with real life murders, and will never understand why one spouse will murder the other, instead of getting a divorce. The one that's usually murdered, and in a most barbaric manner, such as Melanie's husband whose body parts have been found in the Chesapeake Bay, is the poor wife!!

Boy would I love to go to the Chesapeake Bay and take a peek inside all those suitcases! heh heh I would have LOVED working in forensic science! Perhaps in my next life!
Aug. 13th, 2007 09:34 pm (UTC)
well screw them...
glad I don;t have one...

el paso huh?

been there a few times...

Aug. 13th, 2007 10:41 pm (UTC)
Re: well screw them...
The longer I live, and the more I see, I'm glad I don't have one, either!

Yes, El Paso. :o(
Re: well screw them... - kayakman - Aug. 14th, 2007 01:41 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 13th, 2007 09:37 pm (UTC)
this isn't Big Brother, though. This is shyster lawyer. EZPass isn't a surveillance device even though you can track someone's movements based on the tolls they pay.
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:38 am (UTC)
All I know is that I don't like the smell of EZPass.

Aye, and what can I say about lawyers. I hate them! But then again, what the hell would we do without them?! :o)
(no subject) - warpedpuppy - Aug. 14th, 2007 07:48 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 13th, 2007 09:38 pm (UTC)
My knee-jerk reaction is that crossing a toll is not private information, it's publicly viewable if you use simple observation, so it's not invasive, per se, but the fact that the records of your passing are kept as evidence is a double edged sword of convenience for honesty and record-keeping should there be a dispute (aka, you charged me too much on my pre-paid toll amount or you, sir, did not pay a toll and here's proof - which I may ignorantly imagine to really not be much of a problem or issue...) And legal weasels will use any means available at least legally, which is their right. The toll companies have a choice, too, to say that their information is private and can refuse or resist a court order, but apparently they don't care that much. It's just digital data to them.

Then again, if you're a cheating piece of shit, you deserve all of the badness that life has for you. Get a spine, some dignity, and some self-respect (as well as respect for the person you cheated on) and communicate in an adult way to solve a problem before it happens and then who gives a shit about data that EZ pass has? It'll be irrelevant, but a fine way to catch the killers who need to be caught. EZ-pass data is only embarrassing if you're guilty of something. Otherwise, it's irrelevant and won't even be focused upon.

It's contextual. I don't mind the idea of using it as evidence for criminal behavior, but I also resent the electronic age's collection of data on a personal identification level that can be misused.

Aug. 14th, 2007 05:45 am (UTC)
Most thought provoking, as always! Thank you!
Aug. 13th, 2007 09:45 pm (UTC)
I don't think you can expect a "right to privacy" when you are breaking the law.

In our automated world, you are "under surveillance" all the time. I don't worry about it because I'm not doing anything wrong. And I say kudos to that smart lawyer who thought to check traffic records. The cheating a$$hole got everything coming to him.
Aug. 13th, 2007 10:27 pm (UTC)
Just get a damn divorce!
Cheating on a spouse is not breaking mans law, but Gods law. Yes, anyone who cheats on their spouse is an asshole, but hey, let them deal with it themselves in the PRIVACY of their home homes in a DIGNIFIED manner.

If a man or woman can’t trust their spouse, then why continue the farce? Just get a damn divorce! The only reason I can see anyone using this E-ZPass is to literally take the other to the cleaners.

And you’re right about that lawyer being smart! The jackass has found yet another way of getting his greedy slimy fingers into people’s pockets! What’s next? Surveillance cameras in bathroom stalls to see if you flushed the damn toilet!

The fact remains, we’re being watched without our consent, and this is only the beginning!
Re: Just get a damn divorce! - thomask - Aug. 13th, 2007 10:57 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Just get a damn divorce! - playgirl - Aug. 14th, 2007 12:44 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 13th, 2007 10:25 pm (UTC)
I think people that are cheating on their wife or husband should be watched it is wrong.
And Big brother heck the hole Internet is big brother and everyone is watching everyone else.
Now isn't that why you will not show your face? :)
hope your day is going well Sunshine Love you!
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:51 am (UTC)
my boss would fire me
For cam girls, enemies accumulate in cyberspace. So, just peek-a-boo face shots will have to do.

Besides, my boss would fire me, my family would disown me, and my friends would shun me! heee
Re: my boss would fire me - moon_shine - Aug. 14th, 2007 05:14 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: my boss would fire me - tigron_x - Aug. 14th, 2007 06:18 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: my boss would fire me - moon_shine3 - Aug. 14th, 2007 09:27 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: my boss would fire me - tigron_x - Aug. 14th, 2007 12:04 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: my boss would fire me - playgirl - Aug. 15th, 2007 01:04 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 13th, 2007 11:01 pm (UTC)
I'm just here for the new icons! haha
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:28 am (UTC)
Re: hehe
Looks like you and I are taking a nap together, huh?! haaaa
Aug. 13th, 2007 11:31 pm (UTC)
Subpoena's are perfectly ok.
You aren't forced to sign up for the EZpass program, and certainly any time you are recorded in some system, and that system is subpoena'd, then there is a risk that your info will come out.

Really, a person shouldn't be lying to their spouse. It's a dangerous thing to do. If you're going to screw around, better at least be honest, and be prepared to live with the consequences.
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:06 am (UTC)
Re: Subpoena's are perfectly ok.
It’s mind boggling how many married couples cheat. I thought this link was interesting:

I thought this was interesting:

Recent studies reveal that 45-55% of married women and 50-60% of married men engage in extramarital sex at some time or another during their relationship (Atwood & Schwartz, 2002 - Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy)
Do these infidelity statistics seem a bit startling?... Or, Perhaps Not!
Basically, what these findings suggest is that approximately one half of all married men and women seek intimacy outside of their committed relationships.
But what does this really mean? Why are the number of men and women having extramarital affairs so high? I'll tell you - these staggeringly high infidelity figures mean that something is really lacking in their marriages to lead them to look else where.
Lacking... So is it Sex? Or something else?

This may come as a complete surprise, but most extramarital affairs are NOT about sex! If not sex, then what? Pay attention - the reason most people find intimacy with someone outside of their marriage is because their emotional needs are not being met. Yes, it's true! Most cases of infidelity are about wanting to feel emotionally connected to someone.

What Do Infidelity Statistics Mean?
Aug. 13th, 2007 11:40 pm (UTC)
Hey Sunshine I posted them pics of the humming birds I said I would :o)
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:08 am (UTC)
a peek
Oh wow! Let me go take a peek! :o)
Re: a peek - moon_shine3 - Aug. 14th, 2007 09:25 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:30 am (UTC)
I say shootem all and let god sort them out.
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:57 am (UTC)
Doggy Shrink
Puppy Puddles, you've become quite rambunctious lately! I must talk to the Doggy Shrink about it!
Re: Doggy Shrink - see_dog - Aug. 14th, 2007 02:08 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Doggy Shrink - playgirl - Aug. 14th, 2007 05:30 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Doggy Shrink - playgirl - Aug. 14th, 2007 05:34 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Doggy Shrink - see_dog - Aug. 14th, 2007 03:44 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: Doggy Shrink - playgirl - Aug. 15th, 2007 12:26 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: Doggy Shrink - see_dog - Aug. 15th, 2007 06:35 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 14th, 2007 01:16 am (UTC)
Ball and chain, hmm. I don't think I would ever describe marraige as being tied down or refering to my wife as the old ball and chain. I would never marry a gal who didn't trust me and my knowlege that she can shoot and would kill me if I ever cheated on her. :D

As for this case, you just have to be smart if you are going to cheat. They have been moving towards doing stuff like this for years. Only the stupid are going to get caght with stuff like this.
Aug. 14th, 2007 04:47 am (UTC)
A marriage without trust, is a marriage that's headed for disaster.

Honestly, I don't see anything difficult in remaining true blue with each other. I believe it would be much easier and less expensive, than to go around cheating!

If I were married, I would never even think of fooling around on my husband, but then, I'll never prove this to be true, since I'll never marry. What a pity!
(no subject) - nishar - Aug. 14th, 2007 07:06 pm (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 14th, 2007 03:03 am (UTC)
Never been married,really don't see the point of it and divorce seems a horrible thing to go through.

Aug. 14th, 2007 04:39 am (UTC)
Yes, divorce is a horrible thing, especially when there are children involved.

I can't understand why those who take the most important step in their lives, don't put every effort in keeping their love and respect for one another alive - ALWAYS.
Aug. 14th, 2007 06:23 am (UTC)
I want a divorce from my government and they owe me half!
Aug. 15th, 2007 01:09 am (UTC)
Well, you better not get a divorce, 'cuz they'll take you to the cleaners!
(no subject) - tigron_x - Aug. 15th, 2007 02:18 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - playgirl - Aug. 17th, 2007 11:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - tigron_x - Aug. 18th, 2007 04:36 am (UTC) - Expand
Aug. 14th, 2007 12:33 pm (UTC)
That would be illegal to do over here... That kind of tracking of people's movements falls under the Data Protection Act...
( 48 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

May 2015


Powered by LiveJournal.com